News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Letters to the editor 

Letters to the editor

14/10/2008 9:02:00 AM
Landfill worry

SIR,

I RECENTLY read the Bega Shire Council’s media release dated October 3: Wanatta Lane design plans available for comment.

Nowhere in council’s media release do they mention anything relating to the provision of a methane drainage plan for the proposed landfill cells. This subject has had scant regard given to it in all previous studies carried out by council’s consultants.

After the initial tip meeting, held at Wolumla hall in February 2002, a sub committee of the Wolumla local area committee was formed to look for alternate suitable tip sites.

I, along with five others, made up that group, which met on several occasions and made alternate site submissions to council.

During a field trip with council waste staff members, Demetri Scordalidies and Bradley Nolan, the problems of fires and explosions caused by methane gas on tip sites was discussed at length, along with other issues.

I was told that this matter would be addressed in the Environmental Impact Study and adequate provision to drain any methane gas produced by the decomposition of garbage would be included in the final design.

It was put to the then waste manager Mr Scordalidies, that methane gas could be seen as a real or perceived threat, by neighbouring landholders and potential property purchasers.

The problem caused by methane leakage at the Cranbourne landfill in Victoria is now being estimated to be costing up to $100 million.

This cost will be ultimately borne by the ratepayers of the two councils who used that waste facility.

Considering the impending class action being considered by those landfills neighbours in Brookland Green, I can only hope for the sake of this shire’s ratepayers, Bega Shire council’s consultants have now fully addressed this issue.

Jeff Smith

Wolumla

Fashion question

SIR,

AS A heading, “Fashion for eternity” (BDN Oct 3) intrigued me.

How should I like to be clothed?

I know, I’d like a loose-fitting robe, any colour will do to sing in a heavenly choir to the King of Kings.

I haven’ been able to get to the beach for years since taking to my wheelchair but between choir practice I look forward to ducking out for a swim.

Yes, in my new birthday suit to a beach that will make Moon Bay look like a swamp.

I also hope to be living in a mansion, by His grace as with His other disciples.

It’ll be a change alright.

Yours faithfully,

Ian Dalwood

Kalaru

Climate change advice

SIR,

WHEN we lived in Central Victoria, we drove to town two or three times a week for shopping.

We kept hearing the advice “save the environment, take a bus to town, not your car”.

There were no bus routes out there, so we bought our own bus, a lovely old Bedford which we then used to go to town for our shopping.

That’s just the sort of folk we are: dedicated to helping the environment, and prepared to put our money where our mouths are.

After a while we realised that we had been given bad advice.

It stands to reason - the car used 10 litres of fuel for the round trip, and the bus used 44 litres.

The car must be better for the environment.

So we sold the bus and moved to the beautiful Bega Valley where we found people just like us - people who were dedicated to helping the environment, but who had been given bad advice.

For in this whole climate change business, there are some facts that are absolute.

1. Saving the environment is seriously big business. A lot of money is involved.

2. Where a lot of money is involved, bad advice is freely given by those who make money out of promoting green energy.

3. Inviting people whose job is selling mega-buck wind factories to advise communities about clean energy is like inviting Saddam Hussein to advise on human rights.

4. Many green power solutions such as photo-voltaic solar farms are relatively non-invasive, while some solutions such as wind factories and emissions trading schemes have victims whose lives can be shattered.

5. In a country formerly renowned for fair play, we don’t compensate the victims. Money speaks louder than conscience.

6. If we turned Australia off tomorrow there would be no measurable difference in the environment. We are just too small to count. Anything we do is just tokenism, which is fine and worthwhile provided the cost is not too high.

7. The rest of the world is not waiting with bated breath to see what Australia does to save the environment. Candidly they couldn’t care less what we do.

Whether or not climate change is real, there is no question that it is pretty dumb to poke all that pollution up into the air we breathe.

However, we need to be realistic about what can be achieved and what the costs can be.

Ineffective solutions that shatter peoples lives are just not worthwhile.

Paul Scherek

Tantawangalo

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

20/11/2008 | There is something worse than having one GFC. That's having two.
Yourguide to Your Toyota
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...